The War on Poverty Turns 50: Why Aren’t We Winning?

Image: Wikipedia

The “war on poverty” turns 50 this week. Judging by the official rate, which has only edged down from 19 percent to 15 percent in that time, poverty is winning the war.


In Annie Lowrey’s excellent overview, the experts blame low wages. The University of Kentucky’s James P. Ziliak and the Obama administration’s Jason Furman agree that “the biggest potential gains that could be made on poverty would be in raising market incomes.”

There’s no question that lower-income wages have fallen behind inflation and productivity growth. But poverty isn’t entirely a crisis of McJobs and minimum-wage workers. In fact, the vast majority of people who earn the minimum wageor work cheap jobs on a full-time basis aren’t in poverty. In households with at least one fully employed person, the poverty rate just 4.6 percent—two-thirds below the national average. The poverty rate among all full-time workers is even lower, at 2.9 percent—scarcely a fifth of the national figure.

Low wages should be a national concern, as globalization and technology have tag-teamed to devastate the buying power of families who struggle annually topay the bills and raise their children. But the pesky poverty rate isn’t just a measure of low wages. It’s sticky high partly because the government’s best efforts to get cash to working families have been offset by the fact that Americans are—for a variety of reasons—working less.*

More from The Atlantic and The New York Times

Posted by Libergirl


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s